There is something about Korean fashion and style that I
don’t quite understand. It is true that they are a fashionable and stylish set,
and wear nice clothes and no doubt take fashion quite seriously, but the effect
it has, its strength, potency, its expression, just doesn't seem right to me
somehow - it seems to lack power, it has no statement about itself. And I can't
quite put my finger on why. Perhaps it’s because I’m not that fashionable
myself? Or perhaps it’s the definition of the word ‘fashionable’? A middle-aged
man wearing a classic tweed jacket and a nice pair of brogues, for example,
would be defined as, by me anyway, as stylish, rather than fashionable.
Furthermore, said middle-aged man in tweed jacket would be saying many other
things like: I’m not a biker, I’m not a chav, I’m not a builder, and so on. Of
course, he might be saying none or any of these, but he’d certainly be giving
off the impression of, well, something. Wearing the jacket and brogues wouldn’t be an
empty statement. The simple fact is, in the West, it would be a statement,
about something. Wearing a biker’s leather jacket is a statement. Clothes are a
statement, even if the statement is ‘these are all I could wear today because
I’m doing my laundry’, ‘I’m getting married today’, ‘I’m going to a funeral’,
or ‘I ride a skateboard’. Fashion in Korea seems empty, devoid
of having anything to say, other than 'I've bought some clothes recently'.
Fashion here smacks of a limited imagination, a reliance on 'being told what to do', of conformism. Of getting your ideas from a magazine. But also importantly, and often missed here is that if you wear the latest ‘magazine clothes’ you hand over your statement about what you’re wearing to a magazine editor, whose only statement on your behalf is ‘look at me I’m fashionable’. It's why fashion here is fashionable, if fashionable means empty and vapid.
Fashion here smacks of a limited imagination, a reliance on 'being told what to do', of conformism. Of getting your ideas from a magazine. But also importantly, and often missed here is that if you wear the latest ‘magazine clothes’ you hand over your statement about what you’re wearing to a magazine editor, whose only statement on your behalf is ‘look at me I’m fashionable’. It's why fashion here is fashionable, if fashionable means empty and vapid.
Maybe the problem is that there's no 'anti-fashion' in Korea ,
and in turn that may be because of Korea ’s
relatively recent entry into, if you like, the world of ‘Western fashion’. We
may have had punks and b-boys and so on in the '70s and '80s, but Korea
almost certainly didn’t, or if they did, they were so few in number as to have
little effect on mainstream culture. If I see, say, a pair of Dr Marten boots
in a store here, they will, for me, have many connotations, for example, work boots,
punk boots, skinheads, 1980s fashion and so on, but for a Korean they may just
look like 'boots'. That's not the man- or woman-on-the-street's fault, but it's
true nonetheless. We make decisions based on decades of previously traversed
fashion phases ("I'm not wearing that I'll look like a '90s raver"),
but countries newer to the forefront (and let's be honest that's Europe and the
USA) of fashion do not have that historical luxury. Everything is new, but
simultaneously, everything is meaningless.
That Korea
has little or no 'anti-fashion' doesn't necessarily mean it should adopt a
whole-hearted punk [or other alternative] ethos with safety pins through noses
or knee-high cyberpunk boots, it means Korea
doesn't have the guys down the pub who make a fashion statement by simply not
being fashionable. Deliberately. In Korea ,
you're either in or out. Back home, the guys in jeans and bikers' leather are
saying 'we don't want to look like the inside of a fashion magazine'. 'That
would be uncool'. And suddenly you’re entering into an arena of
anti-capitalist, or anti-something, sentiment, of not wanting to shop in
Top Man, or wear Abercrombie and Fitch, or wear Gucci sunglasses. To me and
many others this wearing of current middle-to-upper high street brands would be
highly uncool – like popping the collar on your suit jacket, or holding a cigarette between your teeth – I’d never do
it – to me it looks like ‘trying too hard’, like ‘Top Gun’. Trying to be cool
isn't cool. Trying to be fashionable isn't necessarily fashionable. Clothes and
the way you wear them, including choosing not to wear something, is a statement
of attitude, a subscription to who you are and want to be. In many circles,
being 'magazine fashionable' is considered uncool.
Korean fashion lacks any statement outside of ‘I’m
fashionable’. Could you tell who likes jazz or hip-hop or rock from it?
Doubtful. Could you in London or San
Diego or Bruges ?
Probably. Clothes are an expression, of who you are, of what you believe. Even
if you believe fashion is a fat waste of time your non-conformist, conformist jeans
and t-shirt (or whatever) are saying so.
I think it will take a decade or two for Korea
to realise its full potential in fashion. Many here think it's made it now, but
I disagree. Fashion here says nothing, and until it does, it doesn't. It's not
cool to try and be cool. It's a kind of
Catch 22 that I think fashionistas in Korea
often don't understand. It's simply not that fashionable to be fashionable.
No comments:
Post a Comment